How Activism Can Shape Legal Strategy: The Case of Pauli Murray

Abstract

When asked to identify important legal strategists in the quest for civil rights, most of us would quickly identify Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. That makes sense. Houston and Marshall were the architects of the NAACP’s litigation campaign against segregation that culminated in Brown v. Board of Education. Ginsburg led the legal assault on gender discrimination during the 1970s that persuaded the Supreme Court to begin striking down sex-based laws and policies after more than a century of indifference at best.

We should also recognize another, less celebrated legal strategist who played an important role in changing the law of both racial and gender discrimination. Pauli Murray, unlike the better-known Houston, Marshall, and Ginsburg, came relatively late to the law from a life of activism. She was also a poet, professor, and eventually the first Black female Episcopal priest; her gender fluidity has received increasing attention in the four decades since her death. This Article suggests that Murray shaped the legal strategies pursued by both litigation campaigns and that her activism prompted her to propose more ambitious litigation efforts than might otherwise have been pursued. In doing so, this Article illuminates aspects of Murray’s work as an activist and a lawyer that have received relatively little attention among legal scholars. It also offers additional evidence of Murray’s uniqueness as someone who transcended intellectual, professional, and other boundaries. At the same time, Murray’s experience offers insights into the general relationship between direct action and litigation.

Part I addresses Murray’s activism in the years before she decided to attend law school, efforts that put her in touch with Marshall and other leading civil rights lawyers in the early stages of the campaign against segregation. Part II focuses on her law school years, a time when she excelled academically while continuing to engage in protests and demonstrations that served as precursors to other lawsuits that undermined racial discrimination. This Part also speaks to how her activism elicited a more ambitious legal strategy that lawyers challenging segregation later used in their work. Part III concentrates on Murray’s work that helped to structure the campaign against gender discrimination. Finally, the concluding section explores the insights we might gain into how Murray illuminates the synergy between activism and litigation.

Keywords

Pauli Murry, legal strategist

Publication Date

2026

Document Type

Article

Place of Original Publication

Howard Human & Civil Rights Law Review

Publication Information

X Howard Human & Civil Rights Law Review 124 (2026)

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS Jonathan L. Entin Faculty Bio