Abstract
For some reason, Justice Thomas has taken to inserting commas in places they don’t belong. In particular, he writes one clause of a compound sentence, followed by a comma before any conjunction, and, then he throws in a comma after the conjunction as well (as I just did—incorrectly—for illustrative purposes). Or, he begins a sentence with a conjunction and then he routinely drops a comma after the conjunction (again, as I did incorrectly). This article explains the grammatical problem—with copious citations to texts on writing—and then ponders why the Justice is doing this. One hypothetical: as a good originalist, he is following the practices of the founders, who used commas throughout the Constitution in places where the commas don’t seem helpful. We should study and generally follow the founders’ political theories, but let’s consign their use of commas to the dustbin.
Keywords
Commas, Justice Thomas, legal writing
Publication Date
2025
Document Type
Article
Publication Information
28 Green Bag 2d 99 (2025)
Repository Citation
Jensen, Erik M., "A Comment on Justice Thomas’s Commas" (2025). Faculty Publications. 2348.
https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/2348