This symposium has renewed discussion of the apparent paradox of at- tempting to apply mathematical probabilities to the logic of trials. Brought to academic attention by the stimulating work of L. Jonathan Cohen,' the debate reflects a more general controversy over the virtues of quantifying legal decisionmaking. In this brief comment I do not intend to take sides either in this debate or in the more general controversy. I want only to draw attention to a weakness in the legal interpretations which underlie much of the debate.
Place of Original Publication
Boston University Law Review
66 Boston University Law Review 947 (1986)
Nance, Dale A., "A Comment on the Supposed Paradoxes of a Mathematical Interpretation of the Logic of Trials" (1986). Faculty Publications. 456.