Authors

Dale A. Nance

Abstract

This symposium has renewed discussion of the apparent paradox of at- tempting to apply mathematical probabilities to the logic of trials. Brought to academic attention by the stimulating work of L. Jonathan Cohen,' the debate reflects a more general controversy over the virtues of quantifying legal decisionmaking. In this brief comment I do not intend to take sides either in this debate or in the more general controversy. I want only to draw attention to a weakness in the legal interpretations which underlie much of the debate.

Keywords

Mathematical Probablilities

Publication Date

1986

Document Type

Article

Place of Original Publication

Boston University Law Review

Publication Information

66 Boston University Law Review 947 (1986)

Included in

Litigation Commons

Share

COinS Dale A. Nance Faculty Bio