Abstract

This article examines the paradoxical question of whether the International Criminal Court will require justice at the expense of peace. Notwithstanding the popular catch phrase of the 1990s - "no peace without justice"' - peace and justice are sometimes incompatible goals. To end an international or internal conflict, negotiations must often be conducted with the very leaders who were responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity. When this is the case, insisting on criminal prosecutions can prolong the conflict, resulting in more death, destruction, and human suffering.

Keywords

International aspects, Criminal courts, Amnesty

Publication Date

1999

Document Type

Article

Publication Information

32 Cornell International Law Journal 507 (1999)

Share

COinS Michael P. Scharf Faculty Bio