Abstract

This article examines a 1998 Tax Court decision, Warbus v. Commissioner, that has implications for both American Indian law and federal tax law. Section 7873 of the Internal Revenue Code exempts from taxation amounts derived by American Indian tribal members from fishing-rights related activit[ies] of their tribes. Taxpayer Warbus claimed that discharge of indebtedness income from the foreclosure of his fishing boat qualified for the exclusion; the Tax Court said no. The author argues that Warbus was wrongly decided for two reasons: the court failed to take account of basic principles of American Indian law, and the court misapplied the controlling statutory language in section 7873. Warbus is the first case to explicate that section, and it could have unfortunate consequences for American Indian tribes. The author explains why that should not happen.

Keywords

Warbus v. Commissioner, IRC 7873, Indian Tribes, Taxation, American Indian Law

Publication Date

1998

Document Type

Article

Place of Original Publication

North Dakota Law Review

Publication Information

74 North Dakota Law Review 691 (1998)

Share

COinS Erik M. Jensen Faculty Bio