The Burdens of Proof: Discriminatory Power, Weight of Evidence, and Tenacity of Belief
Abstract
Adjudicative tribunals in both criminal and noncriminal cases rely on the concept of the "burden of proof" to resolve uncertainty about facts. Perhaps surprisingly, this concept remains clouded and deeply controver sial. Written by an internationally renowned scholar, this book explores contemporary thinking on the evidential requirements that are critical for all practical decision making, including adjudication. Although the idea that evidence must favor one side over the other to a specified degree, such as "beyond reasonable doubt;' is familiar, less well understood is an idea associated with the work ofJohn Maynard Keynes, namely, that there are requirements on the total amount of evidence considered to decide a case. The author expertly explores this distinct Keynesian concept and its impli cations. Hypothetical examples and litigated cases are included to assist understanding of the ideas developed. Implications include an expanded conception of the burden of producing evidence and how it should be administered .
Keywords
Burdens of Proof, Evidence, Facts, Decision Making, Weight of Evidence, Probability
Publication Date
2016
Document Type
Article
OCLC Number
923665198
Repository Citation
Nance, Dale A., "The Burdens of Proof: Discriminatory Power, Weight of Evidence, and Tenacity of Belief" (2016). Faculty Publications. 1989.
https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/1989
