Patent Policy Adrift in a Sea of Anecdote: A Reply to Lichtman
We enjoyed reading and thinking about Doug Lichtman's response to our article on the doctrine of equivalents (DOE), especially his eloquent formulation of the essential policy issues. Apparently, the three of us share roughly the same approach to economic analysis of the DOE. Nevertheless, Lichtman fears we have overestimated the skill of patent attorneys and lost track of the crucial role the DOE plays in augmenting patent scope and bolstering incentives to invent. We write this reply to highlight two largely empirical questions that we disagree about, and explain how these disagreements lead us to very different policy conclusions.
patent scope, invention, doctrine of equivalents, patent claims
Place of Original Publication
Georgetown Law Journal
93 Georgetown Law Review 2033 (2005)
Meurer, Michael J. and Nard, Craig Allen, "Patent Policy Adrift in a Sea of Anecdote: A Reply to Lichtman" (2005). Faculty Publications. 1054.
This document is currently not available here.