Abstract
Part I frames the problem in Whren with a story. Part II sets forth the fundamental Fourth Amendment principle underlying this article— the prohibition against arbitrary search and seizure. Part III explains how arbitrariness applies to Whren, and to police enforcement policies. Part IV describes pretextual traffic stops as a form of entrapment. Part V addresses the Whren Court’s concern that the Fourth Amendment should not vary from place to place. Part VI notes that arbitrariness is distinct from discrimination, and acknowledges that ending arbitrariness would not necessarily end discriminatory law enforcement.
Recommended Citation
Jonathan Witmer-Rich,
Arbitrary Law Enforcement is Unreasonable: Whren's Failure to Hold Police Accountable for Traffic Enforcement Policies, 66 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 1059 (2016)
Available at:
https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol66/iss4/10
