Abstract
One of the most controversial recommendations in the National Academy of Sciences report on forensic science — Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: The Path Forward — concerns the removal of crime laboratories from the administrative control of law enforcement agencies. For decades scholars have commented on the “inbred bias of crime laboratories affiliated with law enforcement agencies.” Some commentators have proposed independent laboratories as the remedy for this problem, and in 22, the Illinois Governor’s Commission on Capital Punishment proposed the establishment of an independent state crime laboratory. This essay documents the problems that triggered the NAS Report’s recommendation. It also examines the counter arguments as well as alternative approaches, including additional measures that should protect forensic analyses from improper influence.
Keywords
Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States, A Path Forward, Forensic Science, Administration, Bias
Publication Date
2010
Document Type
Article
Place of Original Publication
Utah Law Review
Publication Information
Independent Crime Laboratories
Repository Citation
Giannelli, Paul C., "Independent Crime Laboratories: The Problem of Motivational and Cognitive Bias" (2010). Faculty Publications. 603.
https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/603
Comments
2010 Utah Law Review 247 (2010)