The Inferential Arrow: A Comment on Interdisciplinary Conversation
Abstract
The papers by Tim van Gelder and Chris Reed and Glenn Rowe reflect well both the complexity of the issues involved in trying to create a generic and flexible mapping tool useful for the study of various kinds of inference and the ingenuity that is being devoted to addressing these issues. I am particularly intrigued by the efforts described by Reed and Rowe to use a software tool, Araucaria, to translate among different diagrammatic tools developed by various theorists. As an evidence scholar, I come at this primarily with an interest in understanding the tool's use in analyzing evidence and inference in litigated cases. In other words, I come at it largely as Wigmore would. So, I am particularly interested in how Wigmore's famous chart method translates into other diagrammatic templates.
Keywords
Evidence, Inferential Arrow
Publication Date
2007
Document Type
Article
Place of Original Publication
Law, Probability & Risk
Publication Information
6 Law, Probability, & Risk 87 (2007)
Repository Citation
Nance, Dale A., "The Inferential Arrow: A Comment on Interdisciplinary Conversation" (2007). Faculty Publications. 501.
https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/501