Abstract
In this brief comment I want to explore the reasons for this phenomenon. I will illustrate my point by reference to the seminal case of Myers v. United States, which is not discussed in the symposium contribution by Calabresi and Yoo not surprising, because that case was decided well after the period upon which they focus here. After that, I will suggest some reasons why the removal power, despite its limited substantive importance, retains its grip on the academic and political imagination.
Keywords
Removal Power
Publication Date
1997
Document Type
Article
Place of Original Publication
Case Western Reserve Law Review
Publication Information
47 Case Western Reserve Law Review 1595 (1997)
Repository Citation
Entin, Jonathan L., "Synecdoche and the Presidency: The Removal Power as Symbol" (1997). Faculty Publications. 363.
https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/363
