Authors

George W. Dent

Abstract

The social importance and immense costs of pollution make environmental law an ideal arena for reconsidering theories of limited liability for tort. This article examines the question in the context of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CER-CLA).1 Part I reviews the text and legislative history of the Act. Part II analyzes the CERCLA case law on the liability of controlling persons, especially those involving parent corporations. Part III discusses the general theory of limited liability and its exceptions. Part IV applies this general theory to CERCLA and finds that its special features call for distinctive approaches. Part V advocates an approach to controlling person liability that furthers the purposes of the Act without impairing other important policies.

Keywords

Pollution, Limited Liability, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

Publication Date

1991

Document Type

Article

Place of Original Publication

Wake Forest Law Review

Publication Information

26 Wake Forest Law Review 151 (1991)

Share

COinS George W. Dent Faculty Bio